Quantcast
Channel: News Comments: Mysterious bones may belong to John the Baptist ?
Browsing all 14 articles
Browse latest View live

Comment by: Cheer up at 6/16/2012 2:20:49 PM

Oh this should cheer up the Baptists. Some of them think that their denomination founded in 1521 came from John!! But it should also cheer the Roman Catholics up. It well give them a new relic to worship.

View Article



Comment by: Mike from New York at 6/16/2012 2:35:22 PM

Cheer up wrote:Oh this should cheer up the Baptists. Some of them think that their denomination founded in 1521 came from John!! But it should also cheer the Roman Catholics up. It well give them a new...

View Article

Comment by: Jim Lincoln from Nebraska at 6/16/2012 2:45:42 PM

Well, if there was a head included, it wasn't John the Baptist. As far as Baptism: Truth or Tradition, I think most Southern Baptists have it right. Yeah, this would be more bones to venerate, for the...

View Article

Comment by: Russ from Texas at 6/17/2012 8:56:44 AM

I don't Know why they make a big deal about all this considering there is absolutely no way to verify the remains. As far as the head thing goes, you guys do realize that they could have obtained his...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment by: Dopey at 6/17/2012 3:31:26 PM

Jim Lincoln wrote:Well, if there was a head included, it wasn't John the Baptist.You have that right Jim! I remember reading a couple of years ago when one Roman Catholic church in Rome was going to...

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment by: Jim Lincoln from Nebraska at 6/18/2012 3:09:17 PM

Well, Russ, I'm not so sure if John's head was returned. But, if it was, he seemed to have some spares, as Dopey pointed out!

View Article

Comment by: Russ from Texas at 6/19/2012 8:16:54 AM

You mean to tell me Jim that not all the relics in the RCC are real? My faith is shaken...not so much. ;-)

View Article

Comment by: Cheer up at 6/16/2012 2:20:49 PM

Oh this should cheer up the Baptists. Some of them think that their denomination founded in 1521 came from John!! But it should also cheer the Roman Catholics up. It well give them a new relic to worship.

View Article


Comment by: Mike from New York at 6/16/2012 2:35:22 PM

Cheer up wrote:Oh this should cheer up the Baptists. Some of them think that their denomination founded in 1521 came from John!! But it should also cheer the Roman Catholics up. It well give them a new...

View Article


Comment by: Jim Lincoln from Nebraska at 6/16/2012 2:45:42 PM

Well, if there was a head included, it wasn't John the Baptist. As far as [URL=http://www.biblebb.com/files/GRBAP.HTM]]]Baptism: Truth or Tradition[/URL], I think most Southern Baptists have it right....

View Article

Comment by: Russ from Texas at 6/17/2012 8:56:44 AM

I don't Know why they make a big deal about all this considering there is absolutely no way to verify the remains. As far as the head thing goes, you guys do realize that they could have obtained his...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment by: Dopey at 6/17/2012 3:31:26 PM

Jim Lincoln wrote:Well, if there was a head included, it wasn't John the Baptist.You have that right Jim! I remember reading a couple of years ago when one Roman Catholic church in Rome was going to...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Comment by: Jim Lincoln from Nebraska at 6/18/2012 3:09:17 PM

Well, Russ, I'm not so sure if John's head was returned. But, if it was, he seemed to have some spares, as Dopey pointed out!

View Article


Comment by: Russ from Texas at 6/19/2012 8:16:54 AM

You mean to tell me Jim that not all the relics in the RCC are real? My faith is shaken...not so much. ;-)

View Article
Browsing all 14 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images